Senior White House Advisor David Axelrod said yesterday that the tea party movement is unhealthy, while fellow liberal James Carville called it damaging to Republicans.   They expressed confusion of their misguided notion that 95% of Americans just received a tax cut.

Perhaps I can help set the record straight.   First, the tea party movement is not only healthy but it is a necessity in a day and age when government seeks to usurp more of our liberties and rights.   Denouncing the tea party movement shows the true disdain liberals have for freedom of speech and expression. Just as the tea party was needed in the years preceeding the Revolution, it is needed now, for now, like then, we are facing taxation without representation. 

Sure, we may have representatives in Washington but do they represent us. Does spending money on studying pig flatulence and building bridges to nowhere reflect good stewardship of the money they steal out of our paychecks each week? The answer is no.   Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid represent a growing underclass of unproductive citizens that are needed for votes; nothing more, nothing less. 

The political class in Washington is what is fueling the fires in the tea party movement.   The blatant disregard for the will of the taxpaying public is why thousands showed up in protest.   The liberal politicians hatred of you and I is precisely why Governor Rick Perry suggested that Texas may secede.  

While secession may not be the answer now, it is certainly an option that all states should keep on the table if America ceases to be America.   If capitalism is replaced with socialism and freedom replaced with censorship, such as the bans on free speech and guns proposed by liberals, then alternative means to overcoming such un-American behavior must be examined.  

Face it, our nation would be better off without places like Seattle or San Francisco.   For the most part, the population east of the Hudson and West of the Sierras is why we are in the mess we are in today. Without the votes from those regions there would be no B. Hussein Obama in the White House and Congress would be overwhelmingly dominated by conservatives who reflect real American values. 

Ridiculous ideas such as gay marriage, appeasement of terrorists or the welcoming of illegal criminals would be met with looks of scorn, as they should be.   Coddling criminals and marching with NAMBLA would likely net someone a jail sentence themselves.  

Is there any plain in the world of liberalism where hypocrisy doesn’t exist?   Take the meeting of the Congressional Black Caucus with Cuban thug Fidel Castro.   Aside from the black caucus being the epitome of hypocrisy (what if we had a Congressional White Caucus) these people have no shame whatsoever in dealing with rogue foreign leaders.

California communist Barbara Lee called Castro warm and receptive. Fellow communist Bobby Rush (D-IL) said the visit with Castro was like listening to an old friend.   Wow, I wonder what kind of praise he’d heap on other liberal idols such as Hitler, Lenin or Marx? 

Making matters even worse, fellow black caucus member Laura Richardson (D-CA) said that many of her own peeps live in conditions far more squalid than what she witnessed while visiting the despotic island nation where poverty is the norm.   This would the same Laura Richardson whose house was foreclosed upon when she didn’t bother to pay the mortgage company.   What I’d like to know is how someone so irresponsible and obviously stupid can get elected to office. Well then again, these same people just elected Obama. 

I wonder what the Congressional Black Caucus thinks of North Korean gargoyle Kim Jong Il launching a missile capable of delivering a nuke to the west coast? Hmmm, my guess is if this nuke could reach Alabama they’d be all for it. Remember, this cast of characters hates real Americans; especially if you just so happen to be white and live in the south (the last bastion of sanity in America).

Speaking of insanity, the Vermont legislature has voted to allow Neil to marry Bob.   According to the Vermont Senate President Pro Tem Peter Shumlin, "You cannot veto love and commitment between two people," the Democrat said.  That’s right; it’s a free for all in the world of marriage. Fathers and daughters, mothers and sons, man and dog, woman and horse.   Whatever you want, at least in the crazy and confused world of liberal derangement syndrome.  Well almost anything, as I am sure Vermont is first on the list to ban marriage between a man and a woman…unless they so happen to be related. 

Is there anyone in the mainstream media that doesn’t get downright orgasmic when talking of their messiah and his trip to Europe and the Middle East where he kowtowed with cowardly western European socialists and then declared an unholy alliance with the terrorist leaders who seek to annihilate all non Muslims? Isn't the purpose of the press to provide Americans with facts or are we relegated from getting those from People Magazine and Entertainment Tonight? Maybe the alphabet networks should just roll out a red carpet for some suicide bombers being freed from Club Gitmo to have their way yet again on our soil.