I read yesterday that the current Obama induced deficit and future interest will amount to approximately $10 trillion dollars, which is roughly $50,000 per tax paying American.   Rather than waste all this money, perhaps the government should give the money directly to the tax payers.  

Congress needs to pass the Common Sense for America Act and provide a one time payment of $50,000 to everyone who paid taxes in 2008.   If you didn’t pay taxes you get nothing! Sorry, but you gotta pay to play this game.   

The conditions of the payment are that each recipient purchase one American vehicle, pay off their credit card debt and then use the rest to purchase whatever they so desire.   My guess is that this would do far more to stimulate the economy than the eight dollar pittance Obama returned to Americans under the guise of a tax cut.

Perhaps the Republican Party can use the Common Sense for America Act to highlight what has gone so wrong since Democrats took over.   It can be a bully pulpit to expose the true agenda of the left who seek to silence free speech with the incidious fairness doctrine or tax away our right to defend our loved ones with bills designed to eliminate the right to purchase ammunition.   

The fact of the matter is that common sense does still exist in America, it just doesn’t’ exist inside the beltway where terrorists, murderers and pedophiles have more rights than innocent children and Christian Americans. 

My guess is that a Common Sense for America Act could single handedly undo the liberal agenda for a generation.   It would reflect the values held by Americans who believe in God, family values, economic freedom and individual liberty; you know the values held by the founders of our nation.  

It is time that we all band together and demand that the Congress which claims to represent the people do something for the people of this country, rather than bowing at the altar of those who seek to destroy us.   

Lurking behind the green door of the New York Times editorial board is a green memo calling for a ban on the term global warming.   Apparently the staffers of this failed news organization have learned from polling data that the general public considers global warming to be a farce, ranking 20^th out of a list of 20 voter concerns.

This should come as no surprise to any of us who have common sense, or lived through the last winter which was the coldest in a century.   But to the Birkenstock clad liberals, this truly does upset their twisted world view. 

Apparently the general public is beginning to understand that the global warming hoax, which while synonymous with climate change and environmentalism,  has nothing to do with saving the planet and everything to do with increasing taxes, redistributing our wealth and giving the government more power.    

So what’s a biased organization like the Times to do? Pass out a green memo with new code words to use in public.   They will now be speaking of saving money for a more prosperous future instead of mentioning cap and trade, which by the way will be the largest tax in history.   Instead of talking of the environment they will refer to the air we breathe and the water our children drink.  It will just bring tears to the eyes of the Obama electorate.  

The reality is that this type of game playing is part and parcel to the liberal ideology where special interests take precedence over intellectually honest debate.   The inherent problem with liberalism is that everything they stand for is based upon flawed logic, be it their position on coddling criminals, worshiping gay marriage, welcoming illegal aliens, embracing terrorists or marching with NAMBLA. There is absolutely nothing in the realm of liberalism that has any semblance of common sense which is why everything they stand for must be enacted by judicial fiat rather than the vote of the people. 

The bottom line is that we all understand our obligation to be good stewards of God’s creations, be it the forests, the seas or the children put on this earth.   Perhaps if liberals shared the same concerns we'd give credence to their push for environmentalism but the reality of their worldview is eerily similar to what we have seen in dictatorships around the world; do as I say not as a I do, which would explain the liberal propensity to fly private jets around the globe while preaching lies about the changing climate. 

Perhaps now is the time to tell the Times and all their liberal allies that we have caught onto their little charade.   We know that their level of caring for the environment ranks right up there with their wanting to give the productive amongst us a tax cut.   We understand that while they speak of equality the truth is that they put the rights of killers above killed chilren.   At every turn we come across another example of liberal hypocrisy where they do as they please to placate the dumb masses and then turn around and do something else to punish those of us who work hard.  

Lurking behind the green door of the New York Times editorial board is a green memo calling for a ban on the term global warming.   Apparently the staffers of this failed news organization have learned from polling data that the general public considers global warming to be a farce, ranking 20^th out of a list of 20 voter concerns.

This should come as no surprise to any of us who have common sense, or lived through the last winter which was the coldest in a century.   But to the Birkenstock clad liberals, this truly does upset their twisted world view. 

Apparently the general public is beginning to understand that the global warming hoax, which while synonymous with climate change and environmentalism,  has nothing to do with saving the planet and everything to do with increasing taxes, redistributing our wealth and giving the government more power.    

So what’s a biased organization like the Times to do? Pass out a green memo with new code words to use in public.   They will now be speaking of saving money for a more prosperous future instead of mentioning cap and trade, which by the way will be the largest tax in history.   Instead of talking of the environment they will refer to the air we breathe and the water our children drink.  It will just bring tears to the eyes of the Obama electorate.  

The reality is that this type of game playing is part and parcel to the liberal ideology where special interests take precedence over intellectually honest debate.   The inherent problem with liberalism is that everything they stand for is based upon flawed logic, be it their position on coddling criminals, worshiping gay marriage, welcoming illegal aliens, embracing terrorists or marching with NAMBLA. There is absolutely nothing in the realm of liberalism that has any semblance of common sense which is why everything they stand for must be enacted by judicial fiat rather than the vote of the people. 

The bottom line is that we all understand our obligation to be good stewards of God’s creations, be it the forests, the seas or the children put on this earth.   Perhaps if liberals shared the same concerns we'd give credence to their push for environmentalism but the reality of their worldview is eerily similar to what we have seen in dictatorships around the world; do as I say not as a I do, which would explain the liberal propensity to fly private jets around the globe while preaching lies about the changing climate. 

Perhaps now is the time to tell the Times and all their liberal allies that we have caught onto their little charade.   We know that their level of caring for the environment ranks right up there with their wanting to give the productive amongst us a tax cut.   We understand that while they speak of equality the truth is that they put the rights of killers above killed chilren.   At every turn we come across another example of liberal hypocrisy where they do as they please to placate the dumb masses and then turn around and do something else to punish those of us who work hard.  

Lurking behind the green door of the New York Times editorial board is a green memo calling for a ban on the term global warming.   Apparently the staffers of this failed news organization have learned from polling data that the general public considers global warming to be a farce, ranking 20^th out of a list of 20 voter concerns.

This should come as no surprise to any of us who have common sense, or lived through the last winter which was the coldest in a century.   But to the Birkenstock clad liberals, this truly does upset their twisted world view. 

Apparently the general public is beginning to understand that the global warming hoax, which while synonymous with climate change and environmentalism,  has nothing to do with saving the planet and everything to do with increasing taxes, redistributing our wealth and giving the government more power.    

So what’s a biased organization like the Times to do? Pass out a green memo with new code words to use in public.   They will now be speaking of saving money for a more prosperous future instead of mentioning cap and trade, which by the way will be the largest tax in history.   Instead of talking of the environment they will refer to the air we breathe and the water our children drink.  It will just bring tears to the eyes of the Obama electorate.  

The reality is that this type of game playing is part and parcel to the liberal ideology where special interests take precedence over intellectually honest debate.   The inherent problem with liberalism is that everything they stand for is based upon flawed logic, be it their position on coddling criminals, worshiping gay marriage, welcoming illegal aliens, embracing terrorists or marching with NAMBLA. There is absolutely nothing in the realm of liberalism that has any semblance of common sense which is why everything they stand for must be enacted by judicial fiat rather than the vote of the people. 

The bottom line is that we all understand our obligation to be good stewards of God’s creations, be it the forests, the seas or the children put on this earth.   Perhaps if liberals shared the same concerns we'd give credence to their push for environmentalism but the reality of their worldview is eerily similar to what we have seen in dictatorships around the world; do as I say not as a I do, which would explain the liberal propensity to fly private jets around the globe while preaching lies about the changing climate. 

Perhaps now is the time to tell the Times and all their liberal allies that we have caught onto their little charade.   We know that their level of caring for the environment ranks right up there with their wanting to give the productive amongst us a tax cut.   We understand that while they speak of equality the truth is that they put the rights of killers above killed chilren.   At every turn we come across another example of liberal hypocrisy where they do as they please to placate the dumb masses and then turn around and do something else to punish those of us who work hard.