Why is it that liberals hate free speech? One need to look no further than blogger Perez Hilton who is calling Miss USA runner up Carrier Prejean “a dumb bi-tch” because she doesn’t support gay marriage.

At the Miss USA pageant this past weekend Perez Hilton, who describes himself as the queen of all media asked Prejean, “Vermont recently became the 4^th state to legalize same sex marriage. Do you think other states should follow suit? Why or why not?”

The form of the question seems to be asking for an opinion so why is it that a judge, albeit an incompetent one, wouldn’t remain impartial at the answer? Simply put, he is a bigoted, intolerant heterophobe who doesn’t believe that anyone should have the right to share views other than his own. 

There’s not question that Carrie Prejean should have won the Miss USA pageant based upon her answer that marriage should be between a man and a woman.   That’s right Perez, marriage is between Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.   That’s the view shared by the vast majority of Americans so why don’t you just get over it or do us all a favor and move to another country. 

Rather than accept an opinion different than his own, Hilton is now resorting to name calling. He is stating that had Prejean won the pageant he would have stormed the stage and ripped her tiara off. 

Why is it that liberals seek to silence dissenting viewpoints? Is it possible that liberals know that their own worldview is inherently immoral but don’t have the intellectual wherewithal to see outside of their own selfish interests?   Think about it for a second, is there any liberal viewpoint that is actually valid? 

If Hilton is so supportive of gay marriage, does he support other forms of marriage as well?   What if he had asked Prejean about incestuous marriages or polygamy? Would he have the same outrage if she gave the same answer or would he prove to be a hypocrite like most in the gay marriage crowd? Remember, once the definition of marriage is altered for one lifestyle it must be altered for all in order to not be discriminatory. 

We need more Carrie Prejean’s who understand the way things ought to be.   We need sensible people like her to stand up in public forums and express their views regardless of the outcry from the vocal minority who certainly don’t have the best interest of our nation or our society at heart.  

The mere fact that someone like Perez Hilton could even be a judge at the Miss USA pageant demonstrates the new depths being tested by Hollywood.   Contestants like Prejean reflect just the opposite and demonstrate that as a whole, America is full of great people with character and values who aren’t being represented by the liberal elite. 

Once again we see the radical left wing judiciary undermining the will of the people with the Iowa Supreme Court calling laws against gay marriage unconstitutional.   In citing equal protection language they mistakenly believe that gays don’t have the same rights as straights when it comes to marriage. Excuse me, but the last time I checked any adult in this nation, gay or straight, has the right to marry any other consenting adult of the opposite sex. No discrimination; then again this is why liberals hate logic.

The truth is that once again the out of touch jurists are setting a dangerous precedent. Look, if you want to be gay, be gay.   Most Americans could care less if a person is gay, we just want this nonsensical behavior of the courts to stop. The bigger concern is the dangerous precedent set by these types of radical rulings.

The message that these judges, and their anti establishment marriage ilk send is that marriage just doesn’t matter anymore. They view this as an institution deserving of degradation.   Their logic sets the precedent that anyone, regardless of type of deviant lifestyle is entitled to marriage. 

Using their flawed logic, gay marriage is just the start of a very slippery slope where fathers will be allowed to marry daughters and mothers sons. Brothers and sisters are then going to be entitled to the same rights.   What about the guy who wants to marry his dog or his horse? Why not, to preclude them would be discrimination.   What about the pedophile and his prey? If you are going to include one type of alternative lifestyle then you must include all, as not doing so would truly be discriminatory. 

Then we come to the concept of multiple partners, bigamists and polygamists. What about entire families or communities?   As a society we are entering very dangerous grounds here but liberals don’t get it because, well their liberals.   Simply put, liberalism is an incurable disease. It is a cancer on our society like none ever seen before. Liberalism is an affliction of the brain, along the lines of obsessive compulsive disorder or schizophrenia, but at least you can take medication for those. There is no medication for liberalism other than going cold turkey.